Final Thoughtsĭespite a total of 21 graphics cards being tested here, this felt like a really quick look.
That’s not just the impression we get from RPR, but other renderers, as well. If you’re using an older-gen graphics card, these results should make it clear that you’re due for an upgrade. Only the RTX 3090 manages to beat out AMD’s top dog Radeon RX 6900 XT. The totality of the updates and polish AMD has brought to RPR helps its cards give NVIDIA a serious fight. One thing that is made obvious when comparing our Cycles results to this Radeon ProRender set is that AMD wasn’t kidding about its RT acceleration on RDNA2 graphics cards. Interestingly, the Radeon VII didn’t perform as well in the Classroom RPR test as it historically has with the Cycles version, but overall performance from the older-gen Radeon GPUs is still quite good. If you compare these results to those from our Blender 2.91 performance look, you’ll see that some of the scaling is quite different in places.
( Note: While the Radeon ProRender Blender plugin version is 3.0.8, the render engine itself is version 2.0) If you build a project up from scratch with RPR as the target from the start, it won’t be hard to get the end result you’re looking for. Ultimately, there are definitely going to be some noticeable differences, although they’re not always detrimental ones. Since the projects we used for testing here largely match those we use in our regular Blender testing, we compared the end image quality results side-by-side to see how they compared.
MAC RADEON™ PRORENDER PLUG INS FOR BLENDER DRIVER
OS and chipset driver are fully updated before testing.Īll testing was performed on our Ryzen Threadripper 3970X workstation w/ DDR4-3200 8GBx4 Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro.Īll product links in this table are affiliated, and support the website. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (8GB, $699)
MAC RADEON™ PRORENDER PLUG INS FOR BLENDER FULL
Here’s the full list: Graphics Cards Tested w/ Radeon ProRender 3.0.8 older-gen cards, we’re including the Pascal-based GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, Polaris-based RX 590, and also the Vega-based Radeon RX Vega 64 and VII for testing here. To help give a better impression over how the current crop of GPUs perform in RPR vs. We’re working on delivering updated CPU workstation benchmarks soon, so we’ll spend some time this week tweaking the render settings to see if we can get better efficiency out of the CPUs.įortunately, anyone wanting ProRender performance right now likely care most about GPU, so we’re glad to have at least that. In our testing so far, CPU rendering took far longer than we would have expected it to, at least when we compare how the same CPUs and GPUs scale with the Cycles render engine. Following the company’s official Twitter account might not be a bad idea, either.įor this article, we’re going to be focusing on GPU rendering performance, leaving CPU and CPU+GPU for later. If you do dive into RPR, or you’re already using it, you can keep up-to-date with its goings-on at the official blog. On that note, if you want high-res wallpapers of that impressive car render, you can snag it on the ProRender page. Both Blender and Radeon ProRender are advanced tools that empower creators to design incredibly convincing renders – such as the Mercedes-AMG F1 W11 Performance seen in the video above – and yet anyone wanting to get in on that action can do so for absolutely no cost.
0 kommentar(er)
